Road Action

Saturday, January 23, 2010 9:18 AM
Since many of the comments on this blog to date have to do with road action and non-action,I thought I would start a separate location for comments. Since some people think there is a problem with blogs only having one opinion, I ask you here-

What do you think we should do?

We now have the opinion of the CDD Engineer---road building defects. And that there is a need to rebuild certain roads now. And we have her statement to follow the lawyers suggestion to sue before our ability to sue is lost due to delay because of a possible timing issue.
We have the opinion of the CDD lawyer that we need to sue now for the above reason. And that a Construction Certified Attorney is the way to go.
We have the opinion of the consultant construction certified attorney for the CDD that it appears we can't go any further without a suit because of missing documents. That a suit would be the only way to obtain those documents, if they in fact even exist. That our time may run out in the spring or it may in fact of run out already.
We now have proof of company changes which could be construed as changes designed to protect Mr. Maxwell's assets. Those that appear (Sunbiz.com )to divide the holdings of Schreiver and the two Maxwells. Appearing to leave Schreiver only in control of home building and having no ability to negotiate for CRF-the developer.
We have been told that Mr. Maxwell will not meet with our CDD.
We have Margo and Jake who don't want to do anything except continue the delay.I should mention that Margo continues on the record to tell us how great Mr. Maxwell is.
We have Mr. Owens, who was appointed by Maxwell, who obviously didn't want to sue his own company or one of his partners, but continues to join in the discussions and vote against a suit.
We have Mr. Salvin, who has a strong background in construction claims negotiation, who tried to meet with Mr. Maxwell(who wouldn't meet even a year ago)and finally had a meeting with Mr. Schreiver, a year ago, where he tried to open discussions about the road issues. Mr. Schreiver refused to meet further with Mr. Salvin, who at that time was the board chairperson.
Mr. Chickness who tried to negotiate with Mr. Schreiver after that. Mr. Chickness was told the CDD could be given less than $75,000 , and only if the CDD agreed to release the developer from any further legal action of any kind.
What do you want done now? Assessments? Gravel-like roads? Something? Nothing?

Please respond to this Editorial at lakeashtontalk@yahoo.com.
Your name will no be expose.
Editorial by another web site.