Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Interpretation of Dan Perry's letter on May 20, and July 27, 2010

Subject: 27 July 2010 ltr from D Perry to Mr Dotty.pdf (SECURED) - Adobe Acrobat Professional
As you read this 27 July 2010 email from Mr Dan Perry (the lawyer for the HOA and by proxy, the residents lawyer), re-read Mr Perry’s email dated 20 May 2010 to the HOA BOD.

In the 20 May 2010 email, Mr Perry clearly recognizes that the HOA BOD has ALWAYS had full oversight and has ALWAYS been legally responsible for the oversight, management and operations of Bingo. So why in this 27 July 201 email does Mr Perry tell Mr Dotty something completely different?

Is Mr Perry following his own advice to the HOA BOD in his previous email of 20 May 2010, to allow bingo to “…(temporarily) die..” in effort to divert attention away from the pending legal issues faced by the HOA BOD and others that would be held legally held accountable for the mishandling of Bingo operations and its monies, only to resurface later with a new ‘spin’ regarding Bingo?

If you compare these two emails, you will clearly see Mr Perry is advising the HOA BOD one thing and then informs the residents something completely different. Is Mr Perry following the direction of HOA BOD to intentionally mislead the residents OR is he now acting as the HOA BOD’s spin doctor?

I am confused. Are you? I hope you are beginning to see the gravity of the situation and will demand those responsible to be held accountable. Frankly, the fact that the HOA BOD intentionally with held (Collusion) the fact that a formal investigation is on-going and criminal charges could be filed against at least Mr Pontious, while Mr Pontious ran for a HOA BOD seat, is incredulous.

Is this the kind of representation you want from you HOA BOD? Seems to me that they are only interested in protecting and representing themselves vice protecting and representing the residents of Lake Ashton. What do you think?


1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Where is the signature on this article? Who wrote it?